Book review: “The Gospel of Loki”, by Joanne Harris

The Gospel of Loki, by Joanne Harris. A book of fiction heavily based on the Norse myths; “the myths through Loki’s point of view” (think Wicked and Maleficent).

(Though this book is ostensibly about Loki, it does cover most of the myths.The author’s portrayal of Freya’s portrayal–and that of the rest of the Gods–leaves a lot of be desired.)

From my review of it on Amazon:

(3 stars)

I was really excited to read this book, and had some pretty high expectations for it. The blurb and some of the reviews were really positive, so even though I had never heard of this author and I had to pay international shipping rates for it, I bought it. It was right after Thor 2 came out, which I loved (I’m working on the assumption that the Marvel version of Norse mythology and their version of most if not all of the gods, are completely different beings), and I do have to admit that I love both a) Tom Hiddleston and b) how he portrays Loki. (Sorry, Lokeans! Sad but true). I’ve interacted with the Norse Loki a few times now, and I know they’re different (if nothing else, what is up with the hair? how hard is it to give Loki red hair, people? not hard, especially when the actor already has red hair. I should just write up a post about it to get it out of my system), but there seems to be some overlap. In any event, that was part of what spurred me onto get this book. And, I mean, the Norse myths told from Loki’s POV? That’s got to be entertaining, right? Or at least though-provoking.

In theory, at least.

So, the book. I was underwhelmed by it to say the least. It started off strong, with snappy chapter titles and sayings, which were fun for a bit. Also, the fact that she started with the Audhumla creation myth was very exciting, so I knew I was going to see some Real Mythology in the book (as opposed to Marvel-ology), but about a third of the way into it, she lost me. All told, it took me  6 months to read it, and that’s only because I forced myself to finish it so I could pass it on to some friends. (Which almost never happens, at least with a fiction book.)
Positives:
–She really knows her mythology (apparently she is studying ancient Norse at the moment), and almost every major myth is included, though of course from Loki’s perspective
–Her take on the Vanir/Aesir war and Gullvieg-Heide was one I hadn’t seen before, and brought up some interesting possibilities for my understanding the deities and politics involved. The depictions of Gullvieg’s and Mimir’s characters were perhaps the only place in the book where something really new and interesting was happening, and got me thinking. And each myth had a line or two that made me go, “Hmm…” but nothing earth-shattering
–It was great to see the myths from Loki’s point of view, in a villain-turned-hero kind of way. It’s not actually that great of an example of that genre.
–To be fair, the book did start out strong, portraying Loki as vivid rebel about to take on Asgard; and the snappy chapter titles were entertaining. At first.

Negatives:
–Loki is portrayed for the most part boring and whiny. IMHO, he’s arguably one of the most interesting characters of *any* mythology, anywhere; how anyone could make such an interesting God this bland and one-sided, I’ll never know.
–By about a third of the way through the book, the chapter titles started feeling a schtick, and Loki started to lose his panache. Other reviews have pointed out that her constant use of 90s-ish lingo (chillax, for example) and cheap one-liners got old quick, as well.
–Her take on the runes was odd. Runes were called cantrips and essentially were a power word of some kind. Each God was assigned one or two, and lost or gained them as the story went on. Now, I’m pretty familiar with the runes and the rune poems, but even so, I just didn’t get why she assigned which runes to which god, nor did her definitions of individual runes ring true. There was no logic to it that I could see. It’s one of those moments where it really shows that the author doesn’t believe in these Gods or this worldview at all; it might sound interesting or even make sense on a literary level, but it doesn’t feel right at all from a practitioner’s point of view. So, for me, this component actually worked against her, because it really undermined my suspension of disbelief every time one was mentioned. (I think it’s interesting that the people who gave this book 5 stars on Amazon usually started off with, “I’m not familiar with Norse mythology/the Gods/the Runes/Loki at all, but this book was fabulous!” /eyeroll)
–Though obviously I strongly approve of someone researching the actual myths and presenting them in a palatable way to a larger audience, in my opinion she did so at the cost of a more engaging, realistic story. I feel kind of sacrilegious saying this, but I wish she hadn’t included every since myth, or that she had created more of her own storyline to fill in the blanks. She really tried hard, but it was stretch trying to wrap them up into one coherent narrative, much less one from Loki’s POV (Odin’s or his ravens’, maybe; or Yggdrasil’s?) and the book suffered for it.
–Finally, only Odin, Mimir, and Gullvieg were portrayed as anything more than bland caricatures. Every other deity or jotun or animal was a empty shadowpuppet squawking humorless one-liners. It was painful. (Don’t get me started on Freya’s depiction…”Flames…on the side of my face…” )

So, if you have a lot of time, are a fast reader, and somehow get your hands on a free copy of this book, go ahead and read it. There are a few morsels for thought here and there. Otherwise, don’t bother.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s